In the realm of pet tracking, the use of AirTags has sparked a debate among experts, urging pet owners to reconsider this practice. While AirTags have gained popularity for tracking personal items like wallets and keys, experts caution against using them on pets due to potential risks and limitations. The allure of easily attaching an AirTag to a pet’s collar as a preventive measure may seem appealing, but the repercussions demand a closer look.

AirTags, designed by Apple, operate through a secure Bluetooth signal detectable by nearby devices in the Find My network. Priced at $29 each, these compact devices have found utility in tracking various possessions. However, Apple’s official stance does not endorse the use of AirTags on pets, hinting at underlying concerns that pet owners need to acknowledge.

The primary reason experts advise against AirTags for pets stems from safety considerations. Dr. Shannon Vawter, a veterinarian at Thrive Pet Healthcare Wedgewood, highlights the potential dangers if a pet ingests an AirTag. The battery inside poses a significant risk, as ingestion could lead to severe medical complications, necessitating emergency surgery that could cost thousands of dollars. Moreover, the corrosive nature of the battery acid could cause harm to the pet’s gastrointestinal tract.

Tracking limitations further compound the issue. Maleki Burke, founder of Snootiful Hound, emphasizes the restricted tracking capabilities of AirTags, particularly in rural areas where pets are more likely to go missing. Relying on nearby Apple devices for tracking accuracy poses challenges, especially when pets stray far from populated areas, rendering the tracking information unreliable or unavailable.

In light of these concerns, experts advocate for safer alternatives to track pets effectively. Foremost among these recommendations is microchipping, a widely accepted practice that involves implanting a tiny chip beneath the pet’s skin. Microchips contain vital information about the pet and its owner, facilitating quick reunions if the pet gets lost.

In addition to microchipping, experts suggest utilizing GPS collars as a proactive tracking solution. GPS collars offer real-time tracking capabilities, allowing pet owners to locate their pets swiftly in case of escape. While GPS collars may require a subscription, the peace of mind they offer outweighs the costs involved. These collars, integrated into the pet’s accessories, present a safer alternative to AirTags, minimizing the risk of ingestion or other hazards.

Ultimately, the consensus among experts is clear: AirTags, despite their utility for personal items, are not suitable for tracking pets. The combination of microchipping and GPS tracking emerges as a more reliable and secure approach to safeguarding pets and ensuring their swift recovery if they go missing. By prioritizing the safety and well-being of pets, pet owners can embrace technology responsibly while mitigating potential risks associated with pet tracking devices.